Enriching Scholarship 2015 – Tech & Trends May 19, 2015Posted by aquillam in teaching.
Tags: enriching scholarships, teaching_technology
1 comment so far
The University of Michigan’s annual conference on teaching, learning, and technology, Enriching Scholarship, took place, May 4 – 8, 2015. On Thursday, I attended the Interdisciplinary Communities of Practice: Tech Tools, Trends, Ethos session hosted by the Tech & Trends for Communicators group.
They began with a brief history of the group, and who the members are. Many of them mentioned the importance of networking with other members of the university community, especially so they know whose brain to pick when they have a question. The mission of the group is essentially to find and try out new tech and tools and make recommendations about it’s usefulness to the university. One of the primary goals is to break down the silos and reduce duplication of effort.
The group has monthly meetings, on the second Thursday. Most meetings have a videoconference component, so you can join even if you can’t make the actual meeting. There is MCommunity group, trendsandtechteam, and a google+ community .
There was also a discussion of some of things the group has turned up. For example, Periscope or Meercat allow you to live stream from your mobile device via twitter. They are simple and easy to use, but there are also copyright issues, like what if someone live streams copyrighted material to the world, or streaming a private event, and someone there doesn’t want to be recorded.
Of course, no TnT gathering would be truly complete without the round table. Here are some highlights:
- Patricia shared her portable power brick with USB outlets, especially if the plug swivels so you can plug it in (almost) anywhere: http://www.belkin.com/us/BST300-Belkin/p/P-BST300/ (makes her very popular at conferences.)
- She is also taking an EdX course with Stan Lee https://www.edx.org/course/rise-superheroes-impact-pop-culture-smithsonianx-popx1-1x
- Several people noted how great the one tab browser extension is. It allows you to compact browser tabs into a list, so you don’t have to bookmark them, nor keep them all open until you get around to reading them.
- Photo storage is a perennial problem and people have different ideas about what is (and isn’t) good. Nicole said the new Flickr app had some good additions.
- Asana and Trello are good project management tools, each with a devout following!
- If you have something that you think would be great for the digital signs in Bert’s study lounge in the library, the guidelines (including templates) are at http://www.lib.umich.edu/berts-study-lounge/submission-guidelines-berts-study-lounge-screens. Britian might be able to help you with this.
- Sean has a telepresence robot, which is pretty cool, except for the lack of arms (darn those doors). http://www.doublerobotics.com/ and https://www.suitabletech.com/beam/ are the companies to check out if you’re interested.
Enriching Scholarship 2015 – Keynote May 18, 2015Posted by aquillam in teaching.
Tags: Canvas, enriching scholarships, LMS
add a comment
The University of Michigan’s annual conference on teaching, learning, and technology, Enriching Scholarship, took place, May 4 – 8, 2015. The conference always starts with a poster session and keynote. The keynote was recorded and is available on youtube, if you want to see it for yourself.
This year’s keynote was a panel to discuss Unizin and Canvas. Here are a few highlights and (my impression of) the key takeaways.
First, a VERY quick overview of what the things are that the panel is talking about: Unizin is a consortium of schools focused on influencing the digital learning landscape and providing services to the member institutions. The first service available is Canvas, a Learning Management System (LMS). We have a pilot version with a class anyone at Michigan can join. There is a short video about Unizin and the University of Michigan on YouTube.
The panelists (very briefly) were: Sean DeMonner (UM ITS teaching and learning), Tim McKay (UM Physics), Stacy Morrone (Learning Technologies, Indiana University), and Amin Qazi (Unizin CEO). Vice Provost James Hilton moderated. In general, the ideas below were expressed by one panelist first, then generally agreed with by the others, so I haven’t noted the specific source unless there was a compelling reason (also, I’m not always good about getting actual quotes, or making note of who said what…)
LMSs and Educational Software have become sufficiently important that software companies are doing things in those areas for profit. Unizin provides us the clout needed to ensure that the direction taken by those for-profit companions serves our needs, not that we must adapt to what they are willing to provide.
By outsourcing the software development and maintenance to Unizin, we are free to focus on what we actually need or want to do. The innovation can happen in the teaching techniques, not in the tool development. (As an aside, I’m not convinced this will really change things for development. Now, if an instructor has an idea, s/he has to find the funding to develop it. With Unizin, s/he has to convince others it’s a good idea. I don’t actually see a big difference between influencing others to give you money, and influencing others to give you human resources. At least there’s less hunting to do.)
Unizin provides a standardized platform for other companies to tie into. (another aside – anyone who has used publisher provided homework systems has seen the advantages of this – they’ll all tie into something like Blackboard, but forget tying into CTools!)
Commons is another service provided by Unizin. It is basically a repository of creative commons teaching objects. Whether you’re looking for an image, a homework question, or a final report rubric, you can search in the commons and automatically know you have the rights to use it. Sharing can be done on the individual level (person to person), all the way up to the entire Unizin community. While the materials are available through their own portal, Canvas makes it convenient to share or search for objects in the Commons. They are also working on tools to streamline building a course in Canvas using materials from Commons. Ideally, it will be possible for an instructor to integrate a youtube video, one chapter from a textbook, and several “learning outcomes” into a module so the relationship between all the parts is clear, and assignments are automatically aded to the schedule, syllabus, and grades.
Another service in development in Analytics. Again, this ties in to Canvas. Because Canvas integrates so many pieces in the same way across classes and across schools, we will be able to learn from what other instructors are doing. Now, it’s difficult to compare methods used by someone in the college of engineering to someone in LSA. With Unizin’s Analytics, we should not only be able to compare LSA and Engin, we should be able to compare UM and Indiana. Instructors may be able to have homework assignments that automatically adjust to the student, or notify the academic advisor when a student is in trouble.
Longer term, one of the things they are thinking about is what follows the student when s/he leaver the university. Now the only thing they really take with them is the transcript. With the expanded and more uniform Analytics, can we add things like digital badges and certificates? Could a physics student graduate with a portfolio the same way an art student does?
In short, membership in Unizin hopefully provides resources and opportunities that we haven’t had before.
Enriching Scholarship 2015 – Poster Session May 17, 2015Posted by aquillam in teaching.
Tags: enriching scholarships
add a comment
The University of Michigan’s annual conference on teaching, learning, and technology, Enriching Scholarship, took place, May 4 – 8, 2015. The conference always starts with a poster session and keynote. The poster session is often a good chance to network and explore with others. This year, I got sidetracked by a couple conversations and didn’t see most of the posters!
Here are some notes about the posters, in order according to the program. I apparently went backwards, so there are more notes on the later posters.
Posters 1 – 5 were the Provost’s Teaching Innovation Prize. I missed all of these, but they are available online at http://crlt.umich.edu/tip_winners. I was interested in checking out Jill Halpern’s “Calculus in the Commons: Bringing Math to Life”, because it sounds a lot like what we try to do in the intro astro classes (I often hear students comment on the fact that they don’t meet in their scheduled classroom until the third or forth week of classes. I can’t always tell if they think that’s good, or bad.)
Posters 6 – 18 were the Investigating Student Learning Grant winners. They are available online at http://www.crlt.umich.edu/grants-awards/islwinners. I missed some of these.
Cohn et. al found that having students doing work that was evaluated by professionals working in the field enhanced motivation and performance. Their project is titled “Assessing the Impact of Cross-Disciplinary, Project-Focused, Action-Based Immersive Learning Experiences in Healthcare and Engineering”
Adams et al. has a poster titled “Evaluating the Pre-Professional Engineer: Project Team and Individual Performance”. The focus of their work was to get students to move beyond the “everything is fine” assessment of their peers to actual useful evaluation and feedback. This not only leads to more useful peer evaluation within the classes, it helps prepare the students for workplace performance management.
I had just started looking at Gunderson’s “On-Line Collaboration: Generating & Ranking Solutions to Practice Exam Problems in Stats 250” she we were called into the keynote, so I didn’t get to give it the attention I wanted. It allowed students who correctly answered a problem to present their solution to their peers, and peers voted on the best solution.
Posters 18 – 22 were about TTC Projects.
One of the posters was about Canvas. The keynote and several of the sessions I attended also had heavy emphasis on Canvas, so I’ll blog more Canvas things later.
There was also a poster on the teleconferencing capabilities at the Language Resource Center. If you have a need to do something like run a lecture from far away or at an odd time (like from an observatory!), collaborate with another university, or present material in a space that is too small to fit your entire class (like an observatory), teleconferencing may be a solution, and the LRC can help.
Finally, the Center for Research on Teaching and Learning has a great many resources and a lot of research on technology in the classroom. If you have an idea, or have heard of something you want to try out, talk to them first. If there are pitfalls, they probably already know about them. If it’s really new, they might have an idea about how to implement it. If you need resources (like money for a grad student to help you convert to a new form of media) they might be able to point you in the right direction.
Teach Feast 2014: Canvas December 8, 2014Posted by aquillam in teaching.
Tags: LMS, teaching_technology
add a comment
Course Specific information
Where you create a new course, there will be a “Next Steps” link at the bottom to guide you through the typical things you need to do when creating a course.
People can reply to the Announcements, so it’s no longer a one-way only communication tool. You can attach images, files, video, links to assignments, etc. You can also schedule it to go out at some latter time.
Modules let you organize your content, like the Lessons tool did in CTools (Lessons is still in pilot mode, so you may not have seen it).
Conferences uses the Big Blue Button service to do actual teleconference type of session. It is not as easy to use as BlueJeans, and not as powerful as Adobe Connect, but you can run and record from inside Canvas.
People is where you control things like adding participants and creating groups. The roster will automatically be added for you, so you’ll only add people like observers and assistants. Canvas does NOT support friend accounts at this time.
The syllabus , gradebook, and Calendar are built automatically as you add things to the site. You can add extra material (like learning outcomes or a grading scheme) but you can’t hide or remove things.
Files is the canvas equivalent of CTools Resources. Pages allows you to create webpages, or embed websites in your Canvas site.
All graded items go into assignments, no matter which feature you add them in. You can control how the assignment is presented and recorded. For file uploads, you can restrict file types, or even the tools (e.g. only accept submissions through Google Drive). You can also have ungraded assignments.